(現在 過去ログ18216 を表示中)

HOME HELP 新規作成 新着記事 トピック表示 ファイル一覧 検索 過去ログ

[ 最新記事及び返信フォームをトピックトップへ ]

■615252 / inTopicNo.1)  RFptLleEeKmUqzibX
  
□投稿者/ Dewey -(2018/11/08(Thu) 19:14:17) [ID:5rwi0Lto]
http://https://www.weavespindye.org/adalat-hindi-movie-nargis-3047.pdf
    Can I take your number? http://vegsa.org.au/wordpress/endurox-excel-gnc-1a09.pdf#strategy endurox excel reviews  "Of course, none of these major cosmetics brands are for sale but in luxury, nothing is ever for sale. Loro Piana also was not for sale and suddenly Arnault bought it," said one financial adviser specialized in luxury and retail companies.
     https://essexlimos.com/acetyl-l-carnitine-plus-propionyl-l-carnitine-7652.pdf#regions betancourt carnitine plus reviews  Chemical weapons experts say there is little doubt that it was exposure to poison gas of some kind that killed the hundreds of victims, although exactly what chemicals were used could not be determined from just looking at images.
     http://xterrabrasil.com.br/tour/wwwsporto-medde-1b54.pdf www.needmedi-cal.com  The data found that the written pickup line with the greatest overall response rate was "Where are you from originally," especially compared with the standard "Hi" or "What's Up?"
     https://www.weavespindye.org/pronovias-benicarlo-pris-3047.pdf#skinny alquiler piso barato benicarlo  Dr Christopher Browning, chairman of the NHS West Suffolk CCG and a GP in Long Melford said: 但ツツ廬ncreasingly, hospital A&E departments are having to deal with patients turning up with conditions that could easily have been dealt with at home with a well stocked medicine cabinet, by asking their pharmacist for advice, calling NHS 111 or making an appointment with their GP.但ツツ
     http://xterrabrasil.com.br/tour/damiana-leaf-smoke-high-1b54.pdf#said damiana leaf name in hindi  1. I realize it’s summertime, and maybe standards are relaxed, but, Mark Potter is identified as the editor of this copy. Couldn’t he have edited this text more carefully? Couldn’t the opening sentence have been been stated more clearly?! I assume the purpose was to say Steinbrテヱコck accused Merkel “of covering up *UNTIL the looming election* the likelihood that German taxpayers will have to fund further euro zone bailouts,” NOT that “German taxpayers will have to fund further euro zone bailouts *DUE TO a looming election*”但ツ側 The funding of the future bailouts doesn’t result from the “looming election”! It’s not necessitated by the “looming election”! He’s accusing Merkel of concealing the need to fund the bailouts, and he’s saying that her motive for the concealment is to hide this information from German voters until after the election. Aren’t print journalists professional writers and shouldn’t they strive for clarity? Aren’t editors expected to compensate for inevitable “goofs”?
     

引用返信/返信 削除キー/



トピック内ページ移動 / << 0 >>

このトピックに書きこむ

書き込み不可

Mode/  Pass/

HOME HELP 新規作成 新着記事 トピック表示 ファイル一覧 検索 過去ログ

- Child Tree -